Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Assessments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Elwood board highlights student assessment gains, debates regents changes and grading equity
Summary
Board presentations showed year‑over‑year improvements in several Regents and AP subjects while raising questions about declines in some scores, grading equity work and a state recommendation to decouple Regents from graduation requirements pending more detail next month.
Elwood Union Free School District administrators presented Regents and AP results and described district efforts to use data to drive instruction and grading equity.
High School Principal 'mister McNamara' reported improvements in several Regents subjects (notably a six‑point gain in Algebra II pass rate) and strong AP results, including an increase in AP Government averages. He highlighted classroom practices and supports contributing to the gains. Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction 'doctor Hood' said the district implemented a ninth‑grade "essentials literacies" course and is using data teams, benchmark reporting (BARS) and targeted professional development to support continuous improvement.
Board members asked for deeper analysis where percentages fell (for example, a reported drop in English Language Arts 3+ rates from about 90% to 75% year over year) and discussed the influence of small cohort sizes on AP percentage swings. Members requested comparisons to state and national averages and further disaggregation by cohort, teacher assignment and course scheduling.
Doctor Hood referenced preliminary information from the New York State Blue Ribbon Commission suggesting the state is considering decoupling Regents exams from graduation requirements and offering multiple pathways to a diploma (project‑based learning or portfolios). He said the commission's information was not comprehensive and that the state will provide more detail next month; the district will update the community when more is available.
Board members also discussed grading equity work — including aligning weighting of assessments across classrooms, instructional rounds, and administrative book studies on equitable grading — and asked how data will be used to identify gaps and guide reteaching or program shifts.
What happens next: Administrators said they will provide supplemental materials and comparative state data, continue a deeper dive into areas of focus (small cohorts, AP course variations), and report back to the board with targeted recommendations and further analysis.
