Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Magoffin County approves first reading of FY2021 budget amid COVID-19 uncertainties
Summary
Magoffin County held a special meeting April 30 to present the FY2021 budget and approved the budgetfirst reading by voice vote after officials outlined expected revenue shortfalls and fund transfers tied to the pandemic.
Chair called a special Magoffin County meeting to order April 30 and presented the proposed FY2021 budget, saying the county faces COVID-19-related revenue pressure but had reduced expenditures this year.
The chair said the general fund was about 80% spent through March and that the county anticipates a shortfall in revenues, referencing figures in the transcript of roughly $146,000 (and an additional figure later spoken that was unclear). He told members the county had reduced expenditures in the prior year by about $605,000 and cut another roughly $185,000 in the current budget; $125,000 from the county's LGEA fund was proposed to be moved into the general fund to cover community center operations.
Why it matters: the presentation lays out how pandemic-related declines in business activity and tax collections are expected to strain multiple county funds, forcing internal transfers and program cuts to maintain core services.
During the presentation the chair highlighted these points: the road fund includes a FEMA pass-through of about $850,000 that raises both revenues and related expenses; the road fund nevertheless faces an estimated reduction (the chair cited a figure of roughly $110,000 tied to rural aid changes); the county's jail budget receives about $88,000 in revenue but carries expenses the chair described as about $530,000; coal severance receipts were discussed as having fallen to the range of roughly $78,000 to $88,000. The chair also described the county's recycling program as operating at a net loss and said 911 changes and equipment purchases could affect future revenues.
After the presentation the chair asked for a motion to approve the first reading. A motion and a second were recorded in the transcript, and the court approved the first reading by voice vote; the chair declared the motion carried.
The court did not provide supporting documentation for several of the dollar figures cited during the verbal presentation, and some amounts in the transcript were unclear when read back. The chair closed the budget discussion with no further public comment recorded. The first reading now puts the FY2021 draft before the court for the next steps required by local procedure.
