Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates state drill mandates and leans toward drafting resolution to reduce annual lockdown drills
Summary
Board members debated whether state-mandated drill counts traumatize students and agreed to draft a resolution recommending fewer lockdown drills (proposed: two per year) while allowing real incidents to count; members emphasized locked doors and staff training as primary safety measures.
Trustees devoted a lengthy portion of the Sept. 17 meeting to state resolutions and school safety drills after review of the VISTA packet and related proposals.
Several trustees, including Speaker 11 during the meeting, argued that the cumulative number of lockdown drills (which can reach dozens over K–12 tenure) can be traumatic and called for fewer mandated lockdown drills, more focus on locked doors and adult procedures, and better research on effectiveness. Speaker 11 said, "A kid who starts in kindergarten by fifth grade, they'll have done 24 lockdown drills," to argue that the current cadence is excessive.
Other board members noted the need for practical preparedness and suggested complementary practices such as teacher walk‑throughs without students, better documentation of post‑drill after‑action items and preserving the ability to count an actual unplanned emergency as a required drill. One board member cited a post‑Uvalde Education Week survey emphasizing that locked doors were the most critical protective measure.
The board reached a working consensus to draft local resolution language recommending fewer mandated lockdown drills (members converged on a proposal of two per year as a target while allowing for counted real incidents and local discretion) and to submit that language for review by the superintendent and board members prior to a future vote.
