Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Regionalization topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board members discuss regionalization, Albany advocacy and possible opt‑out
Summary
Board members reviewed the New York state regionalization proposal, discussed joint advocacy with neighboring districts and urged a formal conversation about the mechanics and feasibility of opting out of regionalization to protect local resources.
Board members used committee reports and closing remarks at the Dec. 4 meeting to update one another on the state regionalization plan and on plans for legislative advocacy in Albany.
A board member who identified themself as Alex said the board had joined a Nassau County coalition, sent letters and that "the language has changed from the state since." Alex urged the board to explore how to "officially opt out," cautioning that the district is not in a position to share existing resources and suggesting Sachem could lead Long Island districts seeking to avoid regionalization.
Committee members reported plans to advocate for fair funding and relief from unfunded mandates, and to coordinate with neighboring districts (Middle Country, Longwood) on trips to Albany. The committee discussed the NYS PTA lobby day scheduled for March and a separate March trip on March 18; members noted registration details (per‑seat payment for the legislative breakfast) and a Jan. 10 deadline to submit questions for certain forums.
Board members said they plan to review committee recommendations and finalize logistics for any Albany advocacy trip in January. No formal board vote on opt‑out or policy changes was recorded in the public portion of the meeting.
