Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Revision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission recommends UDC amendment to permit battery‑charged electric security fencing for commercial and industrial uses
Summary
Planning staff recommended and the commission unanimously recommended a UDC amendment to define and permit battery‑charged electric fencing and security detection systems (≤12V DC) for commercial/industrial uses, with required non‑electrified perimeter fencing and signage; staff will address zoo/direct‑current fencing separately.
The Planning Commission on June 11 recommended that City Council consider an amendment to the Unified Development Code to permit battery‑charged electric fencing and security detection systems for certain commercial and industrial properties.
Johnny Malpica, presenting the ordinance (Item 8ECODEDash25Dash0002), said the amendment fills a code gap created when the new UDC added language restricting direct‑current shock fencing to agricultural uses. The draft follows recent 2025 state legislation and stakeholder input and would allow battery‑charged energizers up to 12 volts DC, require a non‑electrified perimeter fence not less than five feet, a 4‑inch separation between perimeter and electrified fences, and warning signage posted every 30 feet.
Malpica said building‑permit or minor/major modification review paths would apply depending on project scope. Commissioners asked clarifying questions about installations and whether the zoo’s existing direct‑current fencing would be affected; staff said the zoo matter would be handled separately.
Commissioner Hensler moved to recommend approval to City Council; Commissioner Serpilovich seconded. The motion passed unanimously, and staff said the ordinance is expected to proceed to City Council in July 2025.
