Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council discusses historic Jefferson Bridge, community opposition to proposed design and funding options
Summary
Council members and staff discussed neighborhood opposition to the proposed Pollock/Jefferson bridge design, alternatives to preserve historical character, potential funding sources and a roughly $70,000 aesthetics cost that staff said could be sought separately.
Mexico — Council members used the comments portion of the Sept. 23 meeting to air neighborhood concerns about preserving the historic character of the Jefferson Bridge and to ask staff about alternatives and costs.
Drew Williford, the city’s works director and city engineer, said the neighborhood meeting showed residents did not favor the design options presented because they feared the plans did not preserve the structure’s historical qualities. Williford said the city is concerned about weight limits and long-term structural life — he said he would expect service-life concerns within five to ten years — and that staff will explore other funding sources to better preserve history while addressing safety.
Williford described a proposed standard replacement using a box culvert with stamped-concrete aesthetic barriers to evoke historic appearance and said the decorative elements would add about $70,000 to the cost. He said the city faces competing ARPA stormwater grant needs and that funds originally estimated for these bridges (about $300,000 referenced in the discussion) may be reallocated to cover overages on other projects.
Council members asked whether stones or limestone from the existing structure could be salvaged for reuse; Williford said reuse might be possible but the city chose removal and replacement to ensure a standard, maintainable structure. He also noted MoDOT provides bridge-rating services and that the city would rely on MoDOT’s annual recommendations because the city lacks an in-house rating program.
Next steps: Williford said staff will continue to look for funding that might allow more historically sensitive reconstruction, but he offered no firm commitment and cautioned the city’s existing ARPA allocations and other budgetary pressures may limit options.
