Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Wildlife Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident urges council to expand deer removals; staff says state rules limit timing

Springville City Council · May 22, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A Springville resident urged the council to remove or cull urban deer that residents say are damaging gardens; city staff said the council funds a hunter-contract program but state regulations constrain the allowable take window and last year 25 deer were removed.

During public comment, resident Earl Wells told the Springville City Council the city’s urban deer population has increased and many deer live in neighborhoods year-round, creating ongoing damage to gardens and landscape. Wells urged the council to either "remove the deer to more natural habitat or to cull them," saying the animals are born and bred in Springville and are a nuisance to gardeners.

City staff responded that the city maintains a contracted hunter removal program funded by the council but that state regulations significantly limit the time period in which deer may be taken. Staff reported that "25 deer were taken last year" under the program and recalled earlier analysis that estimated "as many as 400 deer living inside the city." Staff said the allowable take dates change annually and that, in the referenced year, the take period will fall in August and September. Staff also noted a logistical requirement that each taken deer be processed quickly so the meat remains usable.

Mayor Packard offered a personal anecdote about encountering deer on his property, describing a failed attempt to frighten a deer away. The mayor’s remarks underscored residents’ frustrations but did not change the city's reliance on the contracted removal program and its need to operate within state timing and processing rules.

Next steps: Staff indicated the program will continue subject to state regulations and the budgeted funding included in the next year's budget. Council did not direct a change to the program during the meeting excerpt.