Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Data Centers Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission weighs data-center outreach, requests informational meeting
Summary
Gloucester County Planning Commission members heard staff briefings on infrastructure needs and potential local impacts of data centers — including tax-rate variations, water use, noise, size and rezoning — and asked staff to schedule an informational session with experts before drafting an ordinance.
The Gloucester County Planning Commission on Dec. 5 discussed preliminary work on data centers, asking staff to organize an informational meeting with outside experts before pursuing a draft ordinance or rezoning.
Staff said the goal is to gather expert presentations and community feedback before drafting regulations for a corridor in the county's north end where data centers may be sited. "Before we spend a lot of time on an ordinance just to get a sense of how people feel about it," a staff speaker said, the commission should first host an information session and invite other localities that have experience with data centers.
Commissioners raised several concerns: wide differences in tax rates used elsewhere (one commissioner asked why Loudoun County’s tax figure was much higher than Chesterfield’s), the potential water and noise impacts of large facilities, the typical site size (discussants cited 30-acre footprints and up to 100–150 acres in some proposals), and rezoning or conditional-use implications. Several members suggested staff query planning departments in nearby counties to learn how data centers have affected those communities.
Staff also noted a JLARC study on data centers due in January and said the county may seek presentations from jurisdictions such as Culpeper and King and Queen and invite assessors to discuss tax-treatment questions. Commissioners asked staff to return findings after the informational meeting rather than immediately drafting ordinance language.
Other business: staff reviewed CIP timelines and reminded commissioners to return project ratings by Dec. 16; staff also noted the Baldwin rezoning and York River Crossing site recommendation had been approved by the board and remain B-2. The commission adjourned following the chair's closing remarks and a motion by Mister Richardson.
What's next: Staff will schedule an informational meeting with data-center experts and report back to the commission; no ordinance or formal rezoning action was taken at this meeting.
