Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
State's new school accountability model shifts focus to mastery, growth and readiness; Gloucester staff warn of resource and morale impacts
Summary
District assessment leaders briefed the board on Virginia's new School Performance and Support Framework, a points-based system emphasizing mastery, growth for all students and readiness (including a 5-C performance task); administrators and the board flagged funding, teacher morale and rapid calculation changes as key concerns.
Gloucester County School Board members heard a detailed briefing Oct. 8 on the Virginia Department of Education's newly adopted School Performance and Support Framework, a points-based accountability system that replaces the previous accreditation model.
The division's director of assessment summarized the framework's three principal categories: mastery (pass rates and integrated reading/writing), growth (an expected-growth model applied to all students), and readiness (chronic absenteeism, advanced coursework and a forthcoming 5-C performance task that measures critical thinking, communication, collaboration and citizenship). "Under the new model, mastery, growth and readiness receive different weights at elementary, middle and high school levels," the director said as materials were still being finalized.
Dr. Worley, a veteran educator in the division, described substantive changes in how schools are evaluated and cautioned that commonly used recovery or substitute-test credit mechanisms are being reduced or removed under the new model. "The big, big change is that the...SOLs . . . the state is looking at growth now," Dr. Worley said, warning that the shift transforms a pass/fail minimum competency paradigm into an achievement-focused test and that many accredited schools statewide could become "off track" under preliminary calculations.
Board members questioned whether the state will provide funding to support the additional work the new framework requires; they also raised concerns about teacher morale if ratings change precipitously. Administrators said they are awaiting final state templates and guidance and plan to apply preliminary templates to last year's data while continuing internal analysis.
Next steps: the division expects more detailed templates and calculation booklets from VDOE; staff will monitor subgroup results, absenteeism trends and readiness metrics and report back to the board as new state guidance arrives.
