Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the County Finance And Contracts topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Camden County approves broad consent agenda, awards $21.9 million supportive-housing contract and authorizes $8 million bond substitution

Camden County Board of Commissioners · November 4, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Camden County Board of Commissioners approved a consent agenda covering grants, contracts, and budget transfers — including a $21,872,680 bid award for a supportive housing project and a requested $8 million bond substitution to fund construction. Officials also adopted a closed-session resolution to discuss personnel matters.

The Camden County Board of Commissioners voted on a broad consent agenda that included grant insertions, contract awards and budget transfers and approved a $21,872,680 contract award for a county supportive housing project, contingent on a separate $8,000,000 bond substitution to fund the construction.

Director Capelli opened the meeting and, noting legal notice, said, “This meeting has been properly advertised and posted in accordance to the Open Public Meetings Act.” The board moved through a lengthy consent docket that included a change order for Kings Highway ($445,475.50), a construction agreement with Conrail for the Berlin Cross Keys Road widening ($550,190.59), a $50,000 spotted-lanternfly chemical-control grant, and numerous Chapter 159 grant insertions for social services and public-safety programs.

The board ratified a state-contract award to Axon Enterprises for evidence.com services totaling $78,701.22 (with $43,111.58 available now and the balance contingent on 2025 budgets). The meeting record shows a bid award for the Camden County supportive housing project of $21,872,680. The agenda notes that funding available for the project was stated in the transcript as approximately $14,000,811.546 (the transcript repeats and misformats that figure); the award and budget are expressly contingent on approval of the bond substitution also on the agenda.

Other procurement approvals included a shared-service agreement for code-blue warming shelters ($170,000), authorization of a CivicReady emergency-notification system ($66,790.28), purchase and upfitting of four Ford police utility vehicles (total vehicle purchase $177,860; upfitting $61,953.20), and authorizations for social-services contracts totaling roughly $979,900 for homeless services (all such awards listed as contingent on passage of Chapter 159 or the 2025 budgets).

The board opened the public portion for comment on the resolutions, heard no speakers, and proceeded by voice vote to close the public portion. Later the board moved to adopt a closed-session resolution, citing Section 8 of the Open Public Meetings Act, chapter 231 PL 1975, to discuss personnel actions; the motion passed by voice vote and the session went into closed session immediately. After closed session concluded, the board reconvened and adjourned.

The agenda language repeatedly notes that multiple awards and budget items are contingent on passage of the 2025 temporary and/or permanent budgets or Chapter 159 resolutions. The transcript records the presence of Commissioner Dyer as excused for the meeting; individual roll-call vote tallies for the consent approvals are not included in the meeting record and approvals were made by voice vote as recorded on the transcript.

What’s next: the supportive-housing contract award and the $8 million bond substitution are tied together in the agenda; both remain subject to the technical and budgetary conditions noted in the meeting record, including the formal passage of the bond substitution and related budget resolutions.