Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sidewalks Vaults topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City proposes new vault rules, seeks assessments for costly downtown sidewalk and vault repairs
Summary
The city engineer presented an inventory linking downtown sidewalk defects to underground vaults, cited a near-$700,000 planned Second Street project (half funded) and previewed a draft municipal-code update and SMID memorandum of agreement to standardize property-owner assessments and vault encroachment rules.
Ken (city engineer) presented the committee with a downtown sidewalk and vault repair briefing, describing an inventory that links many sidewalk defects to underlying vault structures and outlining federal- and city-level constraints on maintenance and reconstruction.
"This is an upcoming project ... Second Street between Third and Fourth Avenues," Ken said, and noted the current planning-stage estimate for that combined sidewalk-and-vault repair is "almost, close to $700,000" with roughly half of that funding in place. He characterized much of the work as capital reconstruction rather than routine maintenance.
Ken said community development will present a proposed memorandum of agreement (MOA) to standardize assessments for SMIDs, allowing property owners to be assessed for shares of capital costs while the city retains responsibility for routine maintenance. He also said a draft update to chapter 9 of the municipal code is under review by the city attorney and would add more explicit vault regulations, including an encroachment-approval process.
"When we construct a public improvement within the right of way, if there's any vaults there ... we want to have the option to remove those," Ken said. He described options including abandonment and filling of vaults, installation of bulkheads, or allowing owners to retain vaults subject to encroachment agreements and maintenance obligations; the city could assess property owners for costs if they failed to maintain vaults.
Committee members discussed affordability and whether the city should offer financing or amortization for small-property owners. Members also asked that staff coordinate outreach to property owners and SPIDs to avoid surprising owners with sudden assessment notices; Ken said MOAs have been shared with SPIDs and staff will consider more formal briefings.
No formal action was taken; staff will pursue code drafting and a public outreach plan ahead of any assessments or code changes.
