Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Helicopter Noise topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee weighs limits on nonessential helicopter flights after Hudson River crash
Summary
After testimony from Hudson County officials and residents, the Senate committee debated Senate Bill 275, which would impose licensing conditions to reduce nonessential helicopter operations, exempt emergency and government flights, and require a 47% reduction measured against the prior 12-month period.
Get email alerts on the Helicopter Noise topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate Bill 275, introduced to the committee as a response to a recent Hudson River helicopter crash, would direct the state'level licensing authority to require reductions in nonessential helicopter operations at facilities licensed by the Department of Transportation. The proposed committee amendments would exempt bona fide news helicopters, political subdivisions and licensed hospitals and health-care providers, and would prohibit sightseeing or tourist helicopters from departing or landing at a licensed vertical aeronautical facility during specified overnight hours as a condition of issuing or renewing a license.
Supporters told the committee the bill is urgent. "We are crying out for help," said Jenny Poo, a 20-year resident of Jersey City, who said helicopters have become "incessant" and disturb children and seniors. Hoboken City Councilman Phil Cohen said the measure should cover all seven days; "So it would be all 7 days by 47%," he said, noting that flights occur on weekends such as Mother's Day. Jersey City Ward D representative Yousef Jamal Saleh said constituents have filed thousands of complaints and warned that low-altitude flights impair the mobility of blind students and disturb veterans: "This industry has shown that they're not able to regulate themselves," he said.
Sponsor and proponent explanation: Vice Chair Mukherjee summarized the amendments and acknowledged limits on state authority. He said the bill "draw[s] upon the state's police and land use powers" to regulate ground-based activity at licensed heliports and helistops while noting the team expects litigation over federal preemption and that the 47% figure was guided by Second Circuit precedent in National Helicopter Corporation v. New York City. Mukherjee also clarified the bill's measurement mechanics: the required reduction is measured against the 12-month period immediately preceding enactment, and the statute would be permanent while the reduction is measured over the first 12 months after enactment.
Opponents were few in the hearing but committee members asked for technical clarifications and local impacts. During the roll call on the motion to amend and release the bill, several senators recorded affirmative votes while Vice Chair Mukherjee recorded "No" on the roll as part of his remarks about continuing work on scope and preemption concerns.
What would change if enacted: licensed vertical flight facilities would be required, as a condition of issuing or renewing a license, to certify they will bar sightseeing or tourist helicopters from departing or landing during the overnight hours set out in the amendment. The Commission (Department) of Transportation would be directed to adopt rules implementing the licensing condition, to the extent permitted under federal law; the bill also carves out exemptions for news, medical and public-safety flights.
Next steps: The committee held a roll-call vote on the motion to amend and release S-275; the transcript records the roll call but does not include a floor action schedule. The sponsor and committee members indicated they will continue to refine statutory language in light of federal preemption concerns and litigation risk.
