Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Police Training topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee hears broad testimony on bill to regulate private police training amid "Street Cop" controversy
Summary
S3586 would require oversight of private law-enforcement training; chiefs, unions and associations supported the goal but warned the bill is broadly written and could create a training gap if the Police Training Commission lacks resources to implement licensing quickly.
Get email alerts on the Police Training topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Senate committee took extensive testimony on S3586, a bill addressing standards and oversight for law-enforcement training providers after a comptroller report and public concern about certain private instructors.
Wayne Blanchard and Sean Lavin of law-enforcement organizations warned the bill's current language is broad and could prevent departments from obtaining essential instruction. "This bill is so broadly written that does that put the association in jeopardy of delivering its message?" Wayne Blanchard asked, urging clearer definitions and exemptions. Sean Lavin of the New Jersey FOP said smaller municipalities might lack the resources to use newly approved trainers and asked for a realistic implementation timeline.
Michael Turner, representing the New Jersey State Association Chiefs of Police, urged the committee to work with stakeholders to define accredited curriculums and proposed exemptions or recognition for established educational institutions. Supporters cited disturbing materials from a private provider called "Street Cop" as the catalyst for reform; one witness said roughly 240 officers attended the criticized trainings and many required retraining.
Committee members expressed support for preventing harmful curriculum but repeatedly raised questions about whether the Police Training Commission (PTC) has the staff and capacity to license or accredit private trainers without interrupting ongoing training cycles. Law-enforcement groups offered to work with sponsors on timelines and exemptions.
The committee did not take a final vote on S3586 at the hearing and asked staff and stakeholders to continue drafting clarifying amendments.
