Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Reproductive Health Travel Advisory topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee advances bill to create reproductive-health travel advisory over opponents' objections
Summary
S-3663, to direct the Secretary of State to create travel advisories describing reproductive health access in other states, was released after a contested hearing where opponents said the bill misrepresents availability of emergency, life-saving care and would politicize health information.
The New Jersey Senate Health and Human Services Committee on Oct. 7 voted to release Senate Bill 3663, a measure directing the Secretary of State to provide travel advisories describing reproductive health care services that residents may encounter when traveling to other states.
Sponsor remarks described the bill as an informational "tool" to alert residents about what services they could expect or might not receive in another state. "It's designed to establish an informational structure to give residents...guidance and alert as to what reproductive health care services they can expect to receive," the sponsor told the committee.
Opponents called the bill misleading and politically motivated. Sean Hyland of the New Jersey Family Policy Center told the committee the bill "is an attempt to use taxpayer funds to politicize the abortion issue" and said the advisory language falsely implies women could be denied life-saving care or face criminal prosecution. John Tomicky of the League of American Families and a New Jersey Right to Life representative echoed those concerns, urging the committee to delay action so legal language could be clarified.
Committee members debated scope and drafting. Senator Schappizzi cautioned that the bill as drafted might overreach by labeling wide geographic areas based on differing laws and urged the sponsor to narrow the advisory criteria. The sponsor said the current draft intentionally leaves room for agencies to determine precise wording and that he welcomed further input.
Despite vocal opposition from pro-life groups and policy advocates who called for amendments, the committee carried the bill out of committee by recorded vote after members said they would continue refining the advisory's wording with health and state departments.
Next steps include inter-agency consultation on the advisory language and statutory definitions to address the accuracy concerns raised in testimony.
