Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Brookside Sup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Page County planners table Brookside recovery facility permit after safety and definition disputes
Summary
The Page County Planning Commission tabled consideration of a special‑use permit for a 41‑bed Brookside recovery treatment center after debate over whether conditions can prevent a future conversion to a higher‑intensity detox facility, and after requests for clearer language, legal review and consultation with VDOT and the sheriff’s office.
The Page County Planning Commission on Wednesday tabled action on a special‑use permit (SUP) for the Brookside recovery treatment center after commissioners asked staff and the county attorney to draft clearer conditions to address public‑safety and definitional concerns.
The work session examined a proposed SUP for up to 41 residents. Staff presented proposed conditions — including exclusions for violent and certain sex offenders — and the applicant supplied a written letter describing the site and operations. Commissioners and attendees pressed for clarity on whether the facility would be a "clinically managed low intensity" recovery program and how the county could prevent the site from later becoming a higher‑intensity detox center.
Commissioners flagged three core issues: ambiguity in county zoning definitions (group home, halfway house, residential care facility); the enforceability of conditions limiting the facility to low‑intensity care; and public‑safety measures such as evacuation planning and perimeter monitoring. One commissioner summarized the board's view of residents, saying, "They're not criminals. They're people who have made a choice," stressing that applicants represented the facility as at‑will, state‑regulated treatment rather than a court‑ordered halfway house.
To address neighbors' safety concerns, several commissioners proposed a security condition requiring a video system covering access points, to be installed and maintained by the operator and designed in consultation with the Page County Sheriff's Office. Commissioners and staff noted legal and privacy limits on interior monitoring and said any condition language must be carefully tied to mitigation of adverse impacts in order to be legally defensible.
County staff and the commission's attorney advised against drafting final binding language during the work session. Commissioners voted to table the SUP and directed staff to develop precise condition wording, consult the county attorney and the sheriff's office on security language, and return with those recommendations at a later meeting.
The item will return to the commission after staff and the county attorney complete the drafting and consultations; no final vote was taken at the work session.
