Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Special Districts topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House debates ballot measure to let businesses form self-taxing districts; measure fails on the floor

Utah House of Representatives · February 21, 1990
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah House debated SJR 21, a proposed constitutional amendment to allow business-promoted special service districts to appear on the ballot. Supporters said voters should decide; opponents warned it could enable forced taxation and exclusion. The resolution did not pass the House vote.

Representative Pignanelli urged colleagues to put a constitutional amendment before Utah voters to let business owners form special service districts that could levy assessments to fund local improvements. "We need to put this on the ballot," he said on the House floor, arguing downtown business alliances in Salt Lake City, Ogden and Provo want authority to improve streets and pedestrian malls.

Opponents warned the proposal risks overriding local elected officials and could be used to impose taxes on unwilling businesses. "If it were a matter of agreement between businesses to tax themselves, I would be the first to vote in favor of this," said Representative Harwood, adding the only reason for a special service district would be to force dissenting businesses to pay. Representative Moody said the measure could strip authority from city and county officials and lead to long-term abuses, telling colleagues it would "compound the very problems" seen with redevelopment agencies.

Supporters responded that SJR 21 merely asks voters whether to broaden constitutional authority and that any implementing statute would be written later by the legislature. Representative Smedley said the resolution would let voters decide the principle and leave the details — such as exemptions and administrative rules — to later statute. Representative James noted local county endorsement and a "resolution of need" would be required before any special district boundaries or levies were set.

After debate, the House recorded a roll-call result of 47 affirmative and 25 negative on the resolution; the clerk announced the measure "fails to pass and will be filed," per the floor record. No statutory change will take effect without further action or another successful ballot measure.