Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House advances $55M initial education‑technology package; sponsors tout public‑private match to reach $220M
Summary
The House passed HB 4‑68 to launch a statewide education technology initiative with an initial $55 million package (including $15 million state match) and a plan to leverage private and vendor matches toward a multi‑year goal described in floor remarks as $220 million.
The Utah House unanimously passed HB 4‑68 on Feb. 16 to create a statewide education‑technology initiative that combines state, private and local matches. Sponsor Representative Richard J. Bradford told the House the plan would put $15 million in state funds in the first year, leverage an estimated $10 million in private sector contributions and vendor commitments, and use local matches and in‑kind contributions to reach a larger multi‑year program target discussed on the floor as roughly $220 million.
Bradford described the program as a partnership among the governor’s office, the State Board of Regents, local school boards and private sector partners intended to expand computer‑assisted learning, long‑distance learning and networking. The bill’s allocation formula, as discussed on the floor, directs 25 percent of the initial appropriation to be distributed equally among Utah’s 40 school districts (about $83,005.31 each under the initial allocation) and 75 percent distributed by average daily membership, protecting a minimum base allocation for every district.
Floor amendments adopted on pink sheets inserted rules about procurement, industry standards for technology evaluation, and conflict‑of‑interest language for steering committee members. Representative Holt successfully moved language to prevent members of the steering committee from benefiting financially either directly or indirectly from the program; the amendment was incorporated into the bill.
Lawmakers debated protections for small districts worried about local matching requirements. The sponsor and other supporters said local matches may include in‑kind contributions (space, infrastructure) and that the steering committee, which includes local district representation, would help protect small districts’ interests. “Out of this initial $55,000,000, there would be $15,000,000 out of state money, $10,000,000 out of the private sector and potential federal matches, $25,000,000 from vendors, and $5,000,000 from locals,” Bradford said, explaining the funding composition the House heard.
HB 4‑68 passed the House as amended by voice vote (reported as 69–0). The bill will be referred to the Senate for further action.
