Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Great Salt Lake Authority topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House debates Great Salt Lake Diking Authority amendments over taxing and eminent-domain powers; bill circled for further amendment
Summary
Floor debate on HB 417 revises last year's Great Salt Lake Diking Authority law to reflect a gubernatorial request that the governor and legislature approve any authority recommendation before public bonding; members questioned retained taxing and eminent-domain powers, discussed a requested $21,000 appropriation for administrative costs, and agreed to circle the bill to draft further amendments.
Get email alerts on the Great Salt Lake Authority topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Smedley explained that House Bill 417 amends the Great Salt Lake Diking Authority law enacted last year to implement commitments made to the governor: recommendations from the authority would return to the governor and legislature for approval before the authority could proceed to public bonding.
A sponsor noted other changes requested by the authority itself, including removing the authority to impose an incremental tax that county commissioners had criticized. During floor questions, members asked about budgetary support and whether any requested appropriation would reimburse out‑of‑pocket expenses; the sponsor said a requested appropriation of about $21,000 would cover routine administrative costs (mailing, postage) and may reimburse some expenses.
Representative Howard pressed that the authority still retained taxing power and eminent-domain authority in the statute, citing specific bill pages and statutory references and proposing amendments to remove those powers. The sponsor and others said the remaining taxing provision was limited in purpose: to ask residents directly affected by the lake frontage whether they wished to fund a study up to a capped amount (the transcript cites a maximum of $1,000,000 in any one year for authorized levies within the affected area).
Because of these concerns, the House agreed to "circle" HB 417 (temporarily set it aside while staff draft a targeted amendment), and the motion to circle carried. The transcript shows agreement by sponsors to work with Representative Howard on amendment language, including the possibility of removing or narrowing eminent-domain language and clarifying taxing authorities.
No final passage vote for HB 417 is recorded in the provided excerpt; the action taken on the floor was to circle the bill for amendment.
