Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Employment Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House rejects bill barring employment discrimination against smokers
Summary
House Bill 331, which would have prohibited employers from discriminating against employees for off‑duty tobacco use, failed on the floor after extended debate and an amendment protecting jobs with inherent health risks; final vote was 32‑38 against the bill.
Representatives debated a bill that would bar employment discrimination against people who smoke off duty. Sponsor Representative Demetrij (floor) described the measure as protecting individual choice and equal treatment for smokers; opponents said the bill risked undermining workplace health policies and could expose employers to legal and insurance costs.
Opponents warned the measure could force employers to retain smokers in jobs where smoking increases workplace hazards (an asbestos‑removal example was cited repeatedly). Representative Ballantine proposed and won an amendment to the bill to preserve employer authority in “employment in which smoking may increase health risks inherent in the employment,” intended to allow job‑specific rules for high‑risk positions.
Floor debate also raised insurance and cost concerns: lawmakers noted that medical expenses tied to smoking affect employer insurance costs and that employers sometimes adopt smoke‑free workplace policies to secure lower premiums. Supporters argued the bill simply prevents discrimination against smokers in unrelated jobs and protects personal liberty.
After amendment and further debate, the House held a vote. The clerk announced the result: 32 affirmative, 38 negative. The measure did not pass and was filed.
