Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Campaign Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House approves narrow campaign finance amendments, adopts legislative intent statement
Summary
The Utah House passed House Bill 157 after debate on language distinguishing official duties from campaign activity; members agreed to place a short legislative intent statement in the House Journal clarifying that reporting requirements do not include official-purpose expenditures.
The Utah House of Representatives voted to pass House Bill 157 on Jan. 30, 1990, adopting amendments intended to clarify the line between official duties and campaign activity and placing a short legislative intent statement in the House Journal. The bill passed the House, receiving 67 affirmative votes and 1 negative.
Supporters said the amendment was designed to make clear that money or services used in an official capacity do not qualify as campaign contributions. Representative Moody, speaking for the sponsor, said the change "would not require contributions and expenditures for official purposes to be reported," and that the intent was to "draw the line" between official and campaign activities. After debate, Moody moved — and the House approved — an intent statement to be spread upon the Journal stating that the amendments distinguish contributions and expenditures for official purposes from those made for campaign purposes.
Opponents and some members urged caution about relying solely on House debate as a record of legislative intent. Representative Maxwell asked that the explanation be printed in the House Journal as a permanent record to help clarify "what the sponsors of the bill on the amendment clearly intended." Representative Harwood and others recommended drafting a formal intent statement and passing it so that it reflected the majority's position, rather than the remarks of a single member.
The House adopted the compromise: the short intent statement proposed from the floor was spread upon the Journal. Supporters said the statement would aid future interpretation while opponents maintained the recordings and transcriptions already provide access to debate. House Bill 157 will be transmitted to the Senate for further action.
What happens next: The bill, as amended and with the journaled intent statement, goes to the Senate for consideration. If enacted, agencies and candidates will apply the clarified reporting provisions as described in the adopted language.
