Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Law Enforcement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House debates sheriff POST certification; bill circled for revisions

Utah House of Representatives · January 23, 1990
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House Bill 243 would require county sheriffs to be POST-certified at the time they take office. Sponsors said the change prevents periods without a certified sheriff; the House suspended rules and circled the bill for clarifications tying it to related measures.

Representative Mike Dimitrych presented House Bill 243 to require county sheriffs to be POST-certified at the time they assume office (moving up the current six‑month certification requirement to immediate certification). He said the sheriff’s association asked for the change so an elected sheriff would be a certified law‑enforcement officer on day one, rather than awaiting certification.

Members questioned whether the requirement would prevent people from filing for sheriff, whether counties would pay for training, what would happen if a newly elected sheriff failed certification, and how HB243 would interact with House Bill 17 (which addresses decertification and filling vacancies). The sponsor acknowledged the possibility that an uncertified sheriff could create a temporary vacancy and explained statutory procedures (county supervisors appoint an acting sheriff) and that counties typically pay for certification.

Staff and members noted language conflicts between HB243 and related bills; after discussion the House voted under suspension of the rules to ‘circle’ the bill so the sponsor and staff could reconcile conflicting language and return with clarified language. The bill was circled for further work rather than advanced to final passage that day.