Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Labor Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House rejects bill to exempt product demonstrators from unemployment coverage
Summary
After lengthy floor debate covering fairness, precedent and payroll impacts, the House voted down substitute Senate Bill 89, which would have exempted in-store product demonstrators from unemployment compensation; the measure failed 29–42.
The Utah House on Feb. 27 considered substitute Senate Bill 89, which would have exempted product demonstrators (in-store sampling staff) from unemployment compensation on the argument that the Internal Revenue Service treats many of them as independent contractors.
Sponsor Representative Glenn Brown argued the exemption addressed a small business burden and said demonstrators typically sign contracts and are paid a job fee rather than hourly wages. "This is a fairness issue," Brown said, adding that the work is generally low-paid, seasonal, and that demonstrators understand they lack unemployment coverage under contract arrangements.
Opponents countered that the measure would create an unfair shift of costs to other employers and would set a precedent for expanding exemptions. Representative Ambrose and others warned that many demonstrators hold multiple jobs and that earnings recorded elsewhere could make the jobs subject to unemployment benefits; Representative Ambrose said exempting this group would erode coverage for low-paid workers.
After extended debate, the House rejected SB89 by recorded vote, 29 in favor and 42 opposed, sending the measure back to the Senate. Floor debate touched on precedent (other exemptions for telephone pollsters, nurses), distributional fairness for employers who would pick up the unemployment-fund burden, and the classification tests used by IRS versus state agencies.
