Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Insurance Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Insurance‑code overhaul clears House after intense debate over HMO 'swing‑out' marketing
Summary
Senate Bill 166, a broad set of insurance‑code revisions, passed after floor amendments and a division of a controversial HMO 'swing‑out' provision; lawmakers debated whether to pause marketing of point‑of‑service/swing‑out HMO products until the Insurance Commissioner issues regulations.
Senate Bill 166, a broad package of insurance‑code amendments, drew extended floor debate over rules governing health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and a so‑called 'swing‑out' or point‑of‑service option that allows limited out‑of‑plan use of non‑HMO providers.
Representative Lewis and Representative Hunsaker introduced competing amendments. Lewis argued the swing‑out feature was being aggressively marketed without sufficient regulatory safeguards and recommended a temporary hold on further marketing until the Insurance Commissioner had completed study and public hearings. "I submit to you that we ought to put a halt on it now," Lewis said on the floor, urging regulation to prevent competitive advantages that could leave consumers exposed if companies failed to meet obligations.
Others, including Representative Howard and Representative Yardley, opposed an outright moratorium, characterizing the changes as pro‑consumer choice and warning that restrictions would curb competition and employer options. The House divided the motion, allowed substitute amendments, corrected drafting errors on the floor (a word change from "injured" to "insured" on page 19, line 11), and ultimately passed the amended bill after further votes and a reconsideration motion.
The transcript records multiple procedural votes: floor amendments were adopted in divided votes, sponsors apologized for a drafting error and moved reconsideration as needed, and the final recorded tally shows the bill passed the House on the day of debate. House members urged future study by the Insurance Commissioner, public hearings and careful regulatory follow‑up.
What happens next: The bill, as amended on the floor, will be returned to the Senate for its further consideration and administrative agencies were signaled to study HMO point‑of‑service issues and rule‑making activity.
