Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Social Services Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves Pignanelli amendments to shift one‑time capital funds toward social services; vote tally unclear for negatives
Summary
Representative Pignanelli and supporters argued for moving one-time capital and internal funds to human services to preserve programs and give state employees raises; the House passed Senate Bill 206 as amended (transcript records 41 affirmative votes; the negative vote count is not specified clearly in the transcript).
Representative Pignanelli pressed the House to reallocate one‑time capital and internal‑service funds to human services and operating needs, saying the change would allow the state to give ‘‘our state employees, our teachers and our higher education employees a 6% raise.’’ He framed the choice as ‘‘bricks and mortar or flesh and blood,’’ urging colleagues to prioritize people and essential social programs over capital projects.
Supporters echoed that argument on the floor. Representative Atkinson said appropriation committee members calculated a minimum need of about $11 million to adequately fund social‑service programs and outlined a plan to generate several million dollars from the proposed supplemental revenues for social services and education.
Opponents raised process and equity concerns. Representative Johnson warned that diverting funds would pull money from an agricultural loan pool set aside to help farmers during drought, arguing that rural borrowers depend on that program. Representative Bishop and others warned that using one‑time money for ongoing programs can create unsustainable expectations if revenues fall next year.
The House opened and closed voting on the Pignanelli amendments to Senate Bill 206 and then voted on Senate Bill 206 as amended. The transcript records that Senate Bill 206 "have received 41 affirmative votes" and that the bill "passes this house." The negative vote count is not clearly recorded in the transcript and therefore is not specified here.
What it means: Lawmakers who supported the amendments presented them as a tradeoff—delaying or trimming capital projects so the state could fund raises and human‑service programs now. Opponents emphasized fiscal prudence and the risk of temporary fixes for ongoing obligations. The immediate result is that Senate Bill 206 moves forward to the Senate with the House amendments.
Next steps: The bill, as amended, will be forwarded to the Senate for further consideration per the floor announcement.
Representative quotes (from the transcript): "This gives us the ability to give our state employees, our teachers and our higher education employees a 6% raise," Representative Pignanelli said. Representative Atkinson said the appropriation committees "said the minimum we need is $11,000,000 to adequately fund social service programs." Representative Johnson cautioned that "you're taking money out of the fund that has been set aside so that farmers can borrow this money to stay alive in their industry."
