Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Environmental Hazard Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves lead‑acid battery disposal law after debate over enforcement and penalties
Summary
House passed HB 146 to require retailers and wholesalers to accept and manage lead‑acid battery recycling, create disposal guidelines and authorize inspections; supporters cited public‑health risks and industry cooperation; the House amended the bill and set an effective date of 01/01/1992. Vote: 53–11.
Representative Proxman introduced HB 146, a bill to regulate disposal and recycling of lead‑acid batteries and to require participating retailers and wholesalers to accept used batteries as part of a consumer exchange program.
Sponsor: “This bill outlines proper disposal of lead acid batteries from end users, and it prohibits disposal in any solid waste treatment or disposal facility,” the sponsor said, describing retailer/wholesaler responsibilities, informational signs for the public, and inspection authority. The sponsor told the House the bill had industry support from retailers, wholesalers and battery manufacturers and cited similar laws enacted in other states.
Debate focused heavily on enforcement and the bill’s fiscal note. Some members expressed concern that an amendment making inspections permissible “only as funding is available” watered down enforcement. Representative Howard called the permissive inspection approach a public‑policy problem, arguing it removes the intended enforcement mechanism and noted the fiscal note estimates $58,000 would be needed for inspection and compliance activities if the state chose to enforce them.
Sponsor’s defense: The sponsor argued the bill targets the most common abuses and provides flexibility for counties and private industry to handle logistics, and said penalties were aligned with other hazardous‑waste and litter statutes. On a floor amendment, the House added an effective date of 01/01/1992 to give businesses time to comply with the new requirements.
Representative Proxman disputed some technical objections about lead and acid, saying, “Lead in and of itself will degrade into the groundwater, whether it’s mixed with acid or not and is very poisonous,” and urged support for what he described as a practical, industry‑backed approach.
The House adopted sponsor amendments, approved an effective date amendment (01/01/1992) and passed HB 146 on a 53–11 roll call. The bill will be forwarded to the Senate for further consideration.
What’s next: The bill’s inspection funding and the practical scope of enforcement were the main outstanding issues flagged for follow‑up during the implementation phase.
