Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Air Quality topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House rejects bill requiring emissions proof for college parking after heated debate
Summary
After extended floor debate, the Utah House voted 32–39 to reject Senate Bill 40, which would have required proof of emissions inspection before colleges on the Wasatch Front issued parking permits. Supporters said the measure targeted high-polluting cars; opponents argued enforcement belongs to government agencies, not campuses.
The Utah House of Representatives on Feb. 13 voted down Senate Bill 40, a measure that would have required universities and colleges on the Wasatch Front to require proof of vehicle emissions inspection before issuing parking permits.
Sponsor Representative Ellerton said the bill ‘‘affords us an opportunity to strike a blow for clean air,’’ contending that targeting high-emitting vehicles would reduce local pollution and public-health harms. He summarized the bill as requiring out-of-area or out-of-state students who park on campus to show compliance with the state’s I/M (inspection and maintenance) program.
Opponents argued the bill misplaced enforcement authority. Representative Goodfellow said the legislation ‘‘attacks the problem’’ in the wrong place and cautioned that making colleges the enforcer of emissions law is poor public policy; Representative Howard also said the measure improperly imposed an enforcement burden on schools rather than government agencies. Other critics said the bill singled out certain students and institutions and urged a statewide approach instead.
Supporters pointed to health and air-quality data. Representative Jones noted studies showing a small share of vehicles produce a disproportionate share of emissions and argued a targeted approach was a reasonable first step in counties with documented inversion and pollution problems.
Following rounds of debate and multiple motions, the House closed voting and recorded 32 votes in favor and 39 opposed; SB 40 failed and was returned to the Senate. The clerk read the result and the House proceeded to other business.
What happens next: Because SB 40 failed on the floor, the measure returns to the Senate for consideration of next steps. Proponents said they may pursue either a statewide proposal in a future session or narrower, revised language.
