Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Background Checks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House adopts amendment to school background-check bill, restoring convictions-only standard
Summary
After debate, the Utah House amended Senate Bill 17 to require criminal background checks of prospective private-school personnel to report convictions rather than arrests and sent the bill back to the Senate. Supporters said the change balances child-safety and individual rights.
Get email alerts on the Background Checks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House voted to amend and approve Senate Bill 17 on a floor motion that narrowed the bill’s background-check language to convictions only. The measure, which would align private-school designees with public-school personnel for criminal-record checks, passed the House and was referred back to the Senate.
Representative Waddes, who introduced the bill on the floor, said the measure directs the Bureau of Criminal Identification to seek broader regional and national criminal-record information and gives any person the opportunity to respond in person to material in a background report. "They do have an actual face-to-face opportunity to respond to any of that information," he said. The bill was amended so that records returned would reflect convictions rather than arrests, removing a broader “arrests or convictions” standard previously added in the Senate.
Representative Birmingham, speaking in support of the House committee amendment, said the committee intentionally removed arrests because being arrested does not prove guilt. "Conviction should. The criminal background check should reveal those convictions," he said while explaining the language change. The body voted in favor of the amendment and then approved the bill as amended.
Voting on the floor was conducted after debate and amendment adoption; the tally announced in the transcript recorded 17 affirmative votes and 0 negative votes. The House’s action sends the amended bill back to the Senate for further consideration.
The change narrows the scope of information employers would see under the proposed law, a point advocates said protects due-process interests while retaining a focus on convictions tied to disqualifying conduct.
