Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House debates and circles major lobbyist-disclosure rewrite amid partisan concerns over reporting thresholds
Summary
A substitute bill to clarify lobbyist-disclosure definitions and reporting requirements drew extended floor debate over thresholds for reporting benefits to officials. Lawmakers debated lowering reporting triggers from $100 to $50 or $25 per person; due to unresolved disagreement the House circled the bill for further action.
The House took up an extensive substitute to the lobbyist-disclosure law that clarifies definitions of expenditures and narrows the scope of activities that trigger registration and reporting. Representative Donner presented the substitute as a product of consultations with the Lieutenant Governor’s office, lobbyists and other stakeholders.
Key changes include a tightened definition of “executive action” to exclude routine items that would have made many appearances before state agencies subject to reporting, and a new definition of “interested person” who need not register as a lobbyist when providing written comments or testifying before a rulemaking hearing. The substitute also clarifies reporting of benefits provided to public officials.
On the floor, a major point of contention was the dollar threshold for reporting benefits provided to officials: some members urged keeping the reporting trigger at $100 (the current level), citing concerns that lower thresholds would create a “linkage” effect that could be used politically in campaigns; others argued for $50 or $25 per person to provide more granular transparency for widely distributed, modest benefits such as dinners or event tickets.
Representative Tanner offered amendments to lower certain reporting triggers; Representative Howard proposed an alternative substitute that would keep some thresholds at $100 while lowering others to $25. After multiple motions and votes the chamber decided to circle the bill for further work rather than resolve all amendments on the floor that day.
