Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Health Insurance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Health-insurance expansion fails on House floor after lengthy debate

Utah House of Representatives · February 19, 1992
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House Bill 120, a package aimed at extending guaranteed insurance coverage and reducing preexisting-condition barriers, failed on a 37–38 roll call after extended floor debate over fiscal impacts and business concerns. Sponsor framed the bill as an initial step toward broader reform.

House Bill 120, advanced as a step toward expanded health-insurance access, failed on the House floor after extended debate and a close roll-call vote, 37 in favor to 38 opposed.

Representative Almonte Evans, who brought the bill forward, framed the proposal as a beginning of broader reform to reduce uninsured rates and prevent cost-shifting to taxpayers and hospitals. He described the bill as a modest, early measure compared with larger proposals under discussion and cited endorsements from Project 2000 and the League of Women Voters as evidence of public interest.

Evans emphasized cost estimates presented to the committee: he said the fiscal note for applying the change to the state group insurance was approximately 1% of premiums (cited on the floor as roughly $1 million when applied to state group premiums of about $66 million). He argued that reducing uncompensated care and cost shifting could offset some of the expense.

Opponents on the floor repeatedly questioned the timing and fiscal exposure, calling the projected costs and administrative burdens to business ‘‘a serious concern’’ and urging caution in a tight budget year. In floor exchanges sponsors were pressed for details about the uninsured risk pool, potential offsets and which groups would be required to offer coverage.

Sponsor Evans urged the chamber to act and warned that voting the bill down would signal to special interests that exemptions and carve-outs are available. “If you vote against this bill, you’re sending the wrong message to everyone concerned about this issue,” he said on the floor.

After a call of the House and a final roll call, House Bill 120 failed and was filed.