Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Campaign Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Long floor fight on campaign-finance reforms ends with narrow House defeat
Summary
Representative Tanner's campaign-finance measure faced extended floor debate over PAC limits, in-kind contributions, candidate personal expenditures and constitutionality; after multiple amendments and roll calls the House voted 33–37 against the final version.
Representative Jordan Tanner presented legislation aimed at curbing the influence of political action committees, corporations and large non-individual contributors by capping certain contributions and emphasizing individual donors. Tanner framed the bill as a way to return campaigns to 'the people' and cited other states with similar laws.
Floor debate stretched for hours: members traded sharply different views about whether the proposed limits would make campaigns unaffordable for working people in some districts, whether limits on PACs could be easily circumvented by independent groups, whether in-kind contributions should be counted, and whether limiting personal expenditures by candidates would be constitutional. Representative Howard and others offered alternate numeric limits and wording; Representative Anderson successfully carried a substitute amendment (adopted on a roll call) that attempted to broaden limits and address loopholes. Opponents argued the limit on funds would favor wealthy candidates, while supporters said the bill levels the playing field and reduces special-interest influence.
Final action: After debate and a string of amendments, the clerk announced a recorded vote on the measure (reported as House Bill 1-47 as amended). The House recorded 33 affirmative votes and 37 negative votes and the bill did not pass.
