Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Trust Lands topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves substitute bill to set up school and institutional trust lands board, funds study
Summary
The Utah House passed a substitute for House Bill 4-16 creating a nine-member School and Institutional Trust Lands Board, authorizing an executive director and a public process to recommend statutory changes; the bill includes a $200,000 appropriation from the land grant maintenance account to fund the board’s work.
Representative Brown pushed a substitute to House Bill 4-16 that would create a nine‑member School and Institutional Trust Lands Board appointed by the governor with the advice and consent of the Senate and directed to return recommended statutory changes by Nov. 30, 1993. "This 9 member board is appointed by the governor with the advice and consent of the senate," Brown said, describing the board’s charge to "come back to the legislature and to the governor with recommendations of statutory changes" to better manage trust lands for the benefit of public schools and other beneficiaries.
The substitute authorizes the board to select an executive director and directs that the board hold public hearings and report to interim committees. The bill provides an appropriation of $200,000 from the land grant maintenance account "to fund the activities of this board in this process," Brown said, noting the funds may cover public information and outside expertise.
During floor debate, members expressed concern the substitute delays implementation and could increase administrative charges against the trust. Representative Tanner characterized the substitute as a delay: "it seems to me to just simply delay to an extent the whole issue, again by appointing this board." Representative Lisonbee and others pressed on whether conservation interests were represented; an amendment proposed to add "conservation" to the nominating categories failed after Representative Brown argued conservation is covered under land management and warned against overloading the board with user-group representatives.
Brown and supporters described the substitute as a negotiated compromise with the governor’s office and the task force, designed to allow public input before implementing the full management changes. The House voted to pass the substitute; the clerk recorded House Bill 4-16 as having received 65 affirmative and 0 negative votes and referred it to the Senate for consideration.
The next procedural step is Senate consideration of the House substitute language and eventual governor review if the Senate concurs. The bill requires the board to report recommended statutory changes back to the Legislature and specified interim committees by Nov. 30, 1993.
