Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the HJR 12 (constitutional Convention Call) topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House lifts HJR 12 from rules after heated debate, 38–35
Summary
After more than an hour of debate over process and precedence, the Utah House voted 38–35 to lift HJR 12 (a resolution related to a constitutional convention call) from the rules committee to the top of the third‑reading calendar. A substitute motion to send it to state and local affairs failed.
Representative Vincent Pignanelli moved to lift HJR 12 — a resolution calling for repeal of a previous call for a constitutional convention — out of the rules committee and place it at the top of the third‑reading calendar. The motion opened a contentious floor debate about the role of the rules committee and how priority should be assigned to controversial measures.
Proponents, led by Pignanelli, said the resolution had been held in committee for too long and merited full floor consideration. "This is an important piece of legislation because it deals through appealing of a call for a constitutional convention," Pignanelli said, arguing the House should honor precedent and allow open debate on an issue with statewide impact.
Opponents, including Representative Adams, warned that routinely lifting bills from rules would undermine committee prioritization. "I believe our rule state our house rule state that it is the duty of the rules committee to prioritize legislation," Adams said, urging members to support the committee's judgment.
Representative Bishop offered a substitute motion to lift HJR 12 and assign it to the state and local affairs committee; members voted on that substitute first and it failed. Supporters called instead for placing the resolution on the third‑reading calendar to allow full floor debate; Representative Reese Hunter argued the measure had strong constituent interest and deserved a vote.
After debate and a division vote, the Speaker announced voting closed: HJR 12 received 38 yes votes and 35 no votes and was lifted from the rules committee and placed at the top of the third‑reading calendar.
The House also took the procedural step to "circle" the bill that same day, preserving its place on the calendar while additional scheduling decisions are made. No final third‑reading disposition was taken during this session; the motion before the House at the close of the transcript was to place the resolution for future floor consideration.
The move reflects ongoing tensions between members who favor strict adherence to committee prioritization and those who seek to place high‑salience measures directly before the chamber for full debate.
