Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Environment Waste Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves bill allowing cement kilns to burn certain hazardous wastes after extended debate
Summary
The Utah House passed House Bill 16 after lengthy floor debate over environmental and public-safety risks, allowing cement kilns to burn designated hazardous waste; supporters argued the process locks contaminants into cement, while opponents warned of siting, air and groundwater risks. The bill passed 67–4 and now goes to the Senate.
Representative Moody brought House Bill 16 to the floor to permit cement kilns to burn designated hazardous wastes as a fuel or fuel supplement, arguing the proposal will create a regulated disposal option and reduce costs for industry.
The bill’s sponsor, Representative Moody, said the legislation addresses where and how hazardous waste is handled and urged colleagues to support the bill as a consistent regulatory approach. Opponents pressed for stricter siting and oversight and warned of potential long-term environmental impacts.
Supporters pointed to visits to operating kilns and cited testimony that kiln combustion can chemically bind contaminants into the cement product. Representative Ellertson said cement kilns “are fast becoming one of the most acceptable and, most reasonable ways of doing away with hazardous waste in an effective manner.” He added that, in his view, emissions of certain heavy metals at some kilns were far below accepted EPA standards, and that kilns can capture energy value from wastes now costly to incinerate.
Lawmakers who urged caution raised multiple concerns: Representative Jones highlighted risks to aquifer recharge zones near some kiln sites and warned of potential out‑of‑state importation of waste as economic incentives grow. Representative Wright and others argued the House should not exempt an industry from standard siting criteria or override pending Senate work to define hazardous-waste categories.
Floor debate also focused on distinctions between flammable hazardous waste and toxic hazardous waste and whether the statute would create an unintended permitting loophole. Representative Moody and supporters maintained the bill preserves regulatory oversight while preventing unfair exemptions that let some actors avoid siting requirements imposed on other waste-disposal facilities.
After extended debate and several procedural motions, the House voted to pass House Bill 16. The final tally, as announced on the floor, was 67 affirmative votes and 4 negative votes. The bill advances to the Senate for further consideration.
The House record shows an active, cross‑chamber legislative process remains: additional language and definitions in the Senate could affect implementation and any siting or permitting rules that follow this passage.
