Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House passes $15 million education-technology bill after debate over Applied Technology Centers
Summary
The House approved H.B. 252 (the third leg of the Education Technology Initiative) amid debate about including Applied Technology Centers (ATCs). An amendment to explicitly add ATCs failed; bill passes and heads to the Senate.
Get email alerts on the Education Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House approved House Bill 252, the final phase of the Education Technology Initiative, which carries a $15 million fiscal note intended to expand instructional technology in public schools. The bill passed the House and will be transmitted to the Senate for further consideration.
Sponsor Representative Richard J. Bradford described the initiative as a public–private partnership that has demonstrably improved math and reading scores in classrooms where instructional technology has been placed. "I just urge your support for the continued funding of this initiative," Bradford said during his remarks.
Floor debate centered on whether the bill's funds should explicitly include Applied Technology Centers (ATCs). Representative Proponents argued ATCs are critical to workforce development and that prior legs of the initiative had excluded certain technical programs. Representative Beverly Evans, who said she works for an ATC, warned that centers had closed programs and reduced staff because of funding shortfalls.
Opponents and the sponsor said ATCs have different governance and funding mechanisms and that including them in H.B. 252 as drafted could dilute the initiative's focus on K–12 classrooms. Critics also referenced an internal audit raising accounting questions for some ATC units and urged a separate legislative approach to address ATC needs.
Representative Jones proposed an amendment to add "ATC centers" into the bill's statutory language; that amendment failed on the floor after division and subsequent votes. The House ultimately passed the bill (67–7), with representatives on both sides acknowledging the program's positive classroom results but disagreeing over scope and allocation.
The bill now moves to the Senate; legislators signaled readiness to consider separate measures or appropriations to address ATC funding and governance concerns.
