Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Veterans Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves bill to create Utah Veterans Affairs Office with modest startup funding
Summary
The House passed House Bill 21 to establish a Veterans Affairs Office in the Department of Economic Development. Sponsors said the office will improve coordination of benefits for veterans; the bill carried an estimated $50,000 first‑year cost and passed the House 65‑1.
Get email alerts on the Veterans Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House passed House Bill 21 on Jan. 24, 1992, to establish a Veterans Affairs Office intended to improve outreach and benefit coordination for state veterans.
Sponsor Representative H. Craig Moody told colleagues that Utah was then the only state without a Veterans Affairs Office and described the measure as a companion to a veterans preference bill passed earlier. Moody said the office would be housed in the Department of Economic Development and would require an initial appropriation of about $50,000 to fund a one‑person office and basic computer support to help identify veterans and coordinate services.
During floor debate, numerous representatives declared conflicts of interest because they are veterans or serve on veterans’ committees. Supporters, including representatives who serve on veterans committees or are members of veterans organizations, urged adoption and emphasized track records of volunteer groups while saying coordination was still lacking. Opponents questioned whether private organizations were already providing adequate services; sponsors replied that private groups favor coordination and that the office would help identify veterans who have been missed.
Representative Moody and floor speakers cited fiscal estimates for implementation: the sponsor said the first fiscal year cost would be about $51,900 and the following year about $50,900. After floor discussion and a roll call, House Bill 21 passed by a recorded tally of 65 affirmative votes, 1 negative vote; the bill will be transmitted to the Senate for further consideration.
Next steps: the bill was referred for transmission to the Senate; any required appropriation will be addressed in subsequent budget action.
