Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Air Quality topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House advances clean-fuel package, expanding exemptions to electricity, propane and natural gas

Utah House of Representatives · January 23, 1992
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

An eight-bill air-quality package led by Representative Ellerson passed the Utah House, including HB 38 to expand the definition of clean fuels and tax exemptions to electricity, propane and natural gas. Debate addressed delegation of tax-exempt decisions and transportation-fund impacts; HB 38 passed 68-0.

The Utah House advanced an eight-bill air-quality package developed from the governor—s Clean Air Commission and a legislative task force. The package includes House Bill 38, which would expand the definition of "clean fuels" that qualify for an exemption from the special fuels tax to include electricity, propane and compressed natural gas.

Sponsor Representative Ellerson framed the package as a first step to address unhealthy air along the Wasatch Front, saying the bills target tailpipe emissions and will "take a bite" out of polluted air. "This package of bills— is not going to be a panacea. It—s not the last brick in the building that we—re going to put into place," he said, urging members that the measures are a cornerstone for further action.

Floor debate focused on technical and fiscal issues. Representative Valentine questioned whether delegating to the air-quality board the authority to classify additional fuels for tax exemptions raised constitutional concerns about delegating tax-exempt determinations. Counsel advised members that, in counsel—s view, narrowly defined delegations of authority could meet constitutional standards. Representative Osler and others raised practical concerns about the conversion costs for vehicle owners and the long-term effects on road-fund revenue; members discussed timing and whether exemptions should be temporary to jump-start markets.

Representative Howard proposed amendments and an income-tax workaround intended to protect transportation funds (including a proposed "plus 10%" income-tax credit approach intended to offset administrative burden for claimants), but the proposed amendment to add a 10% income-tax adjustment failed. After debate and amendment consideration, the House passed HB 38 on a recorded count of 68 affirmative votes and no negative votes; the bill will be forwarded to the Senate.

Because the package includes multiple planning, enforcement and incentive measures, the sponsor and committee chairs said follow-up rulemaking and interagency coordination will be required to implement new definitions and exemptions.