Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House unanimously approves technical amendments to condominium service-agent rules (HB71)

Utah House of Representatives · January 14, 1992
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House Bill 71, amending the Condominium Ownership Act to allow designated service agents to be residents or maintain a place of business anywhere in Utah rather than strictly in the city or county of the property, passed 71–0 after sponsor explanation and brief questioning.

The Utah House unanimously passed House Bill 71, which revises service-of-process language in the Condominium Ownership Act so that a person designated to receive service for a condominium association may be a resident of or maintain a place of business anywhere within the state of Utah rather than being limited to the city or county where the property sits.

Sponsor Representative Waddup described HB71 as primarily a set of technical and wording changes drafted by staff, with the key substantive amendment on the state-residency/business-location requirement for a designated service agent. The sponsor said the change responds to timeshare and resort-condominium situations where owners and managers commonly live outside the immediate county and where boards often prefer managers to accept service on behalf of associations.

During questioning, Representative Waters raised concerns about absentee owners and responsibility for deteriorating properties; the sponsor and other members said HB71 helps address condominiums specifically but may not resolve similar issues for standalone houses or apartments. Members observed mortgage companies and out-of-state service agents can complicate enforcement and local remedies.

The presiding officer declared a conflict of interest on the record (noted in the transcript) because of professional dealings with condominiums. After summation and a vote, the Clerk announced HB71 received 71 affirmative votes and zero negative votes. HB71 passed the House and will be forwarded to the Senate for further consideration.

The record describes the amendment's purpose and contains sponsor explanations; it does not include full statutory text or cross-reference to the specific code section in the hearing record.