Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Administrative Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves licensing recodification after amendment to strengthen appeal rights
Summary
Senate Bill 20, a broad recodification of occupational licensing law, passed the House after an amendment was adopted to require district courts to hear certain licensing appeals de novo; supporters said the amendment protects individual rights, while opponents warned it fragments the Utah Administrative Procedures Act.
Senate Bill 20, a comprehensive recodification of Utah’s occupational and professional licensing statutes, drew extended floor debate about the balance of authority among licensing boards, the division director and judicial review. Representative Howard offered an amendment to require district courts to hear appeals de novo and to shift the burden of proof in certain judicial reviews; he framed it as a protection of individuals whose livelihoods were at stake: "De novo means ... from the beginning as though nothing had happened before."
Representative Valentine and other opponents argued the amendment would fragment the Utah Administrative Procedures Act (UAPA) and significantly alter the bill’s fiscal note. Supporters including Representative Meyer and others said the provision preserved due-process rights for licensees facing revocation. The amendment (commonly called the Howard/Harwood amendment in floor remarks) passed after division and House members proceeded to a recorded vote on the amended bill. The House passed SB 20 as amended and returned it to the Senate for consideration of the House amendments.
