Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Background Checks Children topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House Passes Reform Letting Agencies Defer Fingerprints in Child‑Service Background Checks
Summary
Lawmakers approved Senate Bill 84 to align statute with administrative practice: providers who serve children will submit names and identifying information and fingerprints will be taken only if follow‑up cause arises; supporters cited low return rates from mass fingerprinting and opponents urged caution.
The Utah House passed Senate Bill 84, which changes the statutory background‑check process for persons providing services to children so that the Department will collect names and identifying information and pursue fingerprint checks later only when there is reason to investigate.
Representative Hunsaker, the floor sponsor, said administrative rules review revealed a discrepancy between practice and statute. He told the chamber that of about 15,000 fingerprint cards on file, only about 40 led to relevant hits — a return of roughly 0.25 percent — and that the bill would allow the Department to pursue fingerprints when indicated rather than requiring them from all applicants upfront.
“Out of 15,000 fingerprints that they have on hand, they only yielded a hit of 40,” Hunsaker said, describing the limited yield from mass fingerprinting. He argued the Department can use names, addresses and references to screen applicants and reserve fingerprinting for cases where the initial checks raise concern.
Members raised procedural and fairness questions. Representative Chard asked whether the Department would retain fingerprint cards or forward them to the Bureau of Criminal Identification, and Representative Tanner and others cautioned about requesting fingerprints only "after the fact" because applicants could already be working when asked to submit fingerprints.
Hunsaker said the Department retains identifying information and pursues fingerprints when warranted and that the bill brings statute into line with existing practice; he asked for a favorable vote. The clerk announced the vote tally as 68 yes and 4 no, recording passage and noting it would be signed by the speaker pro tem and entered in the journal.
Why it matters: The bill changes the timing and trigger for fingerprint checks for people working with children; it narrows mandatory upfront intrusion while preserving investigatory authority when cause exists. Supporters pointed to very low discovery rates from universal fingerprinting; opponents warned about the risk of deferring checks until after a person begins working.
What happens next: Passage on the House floor was recorded; implementation will depend on the Department's procedures and any accompanying administrative rules.
