Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Hazardous Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves changes to Senate Bill 96 after heated debate over hazardous-waste fees
Summary
After extended floor debate and failed amendments, the Utah House passed Senate Bill 96 on hazardous-waste fees and related funding for inspection and cleanup. Lawmakers argued over fee levels, inspection authority and whether the plan unfairly burdens in-state generators.
The Utah House voted to pass Senate Bill 96, a measure to fund hazardous-waste inspection, emergency response and cleanup, after a day-long floor debate over fee levels and implementation details.
Representative Nielsen introduced floor amendments intended to add money for border, roadway and rail inspections and to create a graduated fee schedule tied to tonnage: $14 for 0–50 tons, $28 for 51–250 tons and $35 for more than 250 tons, with an overall cap and additional emergency-response funding. Nielsen said the changes were meant to ensure the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) can respond to accidents and to ease the burden on small in-state generators while maintaining penalties for large or out-of-state imports.
Opponents, led in floor remarks by Representative Ellickson, said the Nielsen changes duplicated money already in the bill or accompanying measures, would add unnecessary bureaucracy and left important definitions (notably the definition of a “generator” and how multiple in-state facilities’ tonnages would be aggregated) ambiguous. Ellickson argued the amendment would create uncertainty and administrative burden for industry.
The House cut off debate on several procedural motions and rejected the Nielsen pink-sheet amendments on a roll call. Representative Larson’s separate proposal to set the import fee at $10 per ton (an amendment to an earlier amendment) also failed. Floor leadership concluded debate and the body returned Senate Bill 96 to a final vote; the clerk read the final tally as recorded on the floor and announced the bill passed and would be returned to the Senate for consideration of House amendments.
Supporters said the bill strikes a balance between public health and economic reality, and cited reduced waste inflows after previous higher fees. Opponents warned the structure could push some waste-handling costs onto smaller in-state operators and pressed for clearer statutory definitions and collection rules.
The House record (as read on the floor) includes the vote tally announced by the clerk during the session; the tally text in the transcript is presented verbatim as read on the floor. The bill will go back to the Senate for consideration of the House’s amendments and any further action there.
What happens next: The House transmitted its amended version of Senate Bill 96 to the Senate for concurrence with or consideration of the House amendments.
