Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Insurance And Workers Comp topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House backs tougher penalties, clearer definitions to deter workers’ compensation fraud
Summary
House Bill 249 defines fraud in the workers’ compensation system, aligns penalties with communication-fraud statutes and removes an advisory endorsement phrase from benefit checks; the House passed the bill unanimously 72-0 after floor amendments.
The Utah House passed House Bill 249 to tighten definitions and penalties for workers’ compensation fraud and to provide clearer documentation standards for prosecution.
Representative Rob W. Bishop, sponsor, said the bill establishes a definition of fraudulent conduct tied to knowingly and intentionally falsifying claims, aligns penalties with existing communication-fraud statutes, and requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt for criminal prosecution. Bishop cited national estimates and the effect on employers, saying, “Utah, nationally, it is estimated that 20% of all claims are fraudulent. If that were the case in Utah... that would estimate $20,000,000 that's being paid by businesses into the workers' comp fund fraudulently.”
Floor debate included technical questions about the role of intent in the statute and concerns about an advisory endorsement printed on benefit checks that might intimidate legitimate recipients. Representative Howard asked whether a recipient could be frightened by an instruction printed on a check; Bishop and other members agreed to remove the endorsement language and the amendment to delete the sentence passed. Supporters argued the bill would help small businesses and give prosecutors the tools to pursue deliberate fraud; opponents were minimal on the floor. The House approved the bill 72-0 and sent it to the Senate.
Why it mattered: Sponsors said stronger criminal definitions and penalties would reduce abusive claims, lower insurance costs for employers and provide prosecutorial 'teeth' against fraudulent practices while taking care to avoid unintentionally discouraging legitimate beneficiaries from cashing payments.
