Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Health Medicaid topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House approves temporary hospital provider assessment to shore up Medicaid funding

1993 Utah Legislature - Utah House of Representatives · February 19, 1993
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah House passed substitute House Bill 204, a temporary hospital provider assessment sponsors say will generate roughly $36 million with federal match for the Medicaid program and includes intent language to protect certain mental-health referral practices and a sunset date of June 30, 1995.

The Utah House on the floor approved substitute House Bill 204, a temporary hospital provider assessment intended to replace prior voluntary hospital contributions and preserve Medicaid funding.

Sponsor Representative Vincent Valentine described the bill as “a temporary assessment” that would “yield $36,000,000 to our Medicaid system with the federal match,” and said it was designed to stabilize rising Medicaid costs and reduce emergency-room reliance among Medicaid recipients. Valentine and other supporters said exemptions and technical corrections were added during amendment votes to address concerns about freestanding psychiatric hospitals and pharmacists.

Valentine also read legislature intent language that directs the Department of Health, when implementing the provider tax, to ensure that mental-health patients under age 22 and over age 64 are referred equitably among qualified providers that accept the contracted reimbursement rate. The language requires the department to monitor referral distribution and implement a referral grievance process. The intent language also states the assessment will sunset on 06/30/1995.

Lawmakers debated technical amendments and voted to adopt changes described on members’ pink amendment sheets. After the amendments and the motion to spread the intent language on the journal, the House approved the amended bill and sent it to the Senate for further consideration.

What happens next: the bill proceeds to the Senate for further consideration; the House-recorded intent language directs administrative monitoring and a grievance process but does not itself change statute except as adopted in the bill.

Vote and procedural note: the bill was reported passed on the House floor after amendment and the sponsor indicated the intent language was placed on record before referral to the Senate.