Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Religion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House passes law clarifying religion in public schools; sponsor says it draws on federal court rulings
Summary
After extended debate and questions about graduation prayers and school concerts, the Utah House passed House Bill 85 to restate federal case law in state statute and provide intent language to guide schools and courts.
House Bill 85, a measure intended to clarify what public-school employees and students may say or do about religion, passed the Utah House on Feb. 19, 1993, and was referred to the Senate.
The bill’s sponsor told the House the measure is intended to put existing federal court precedent into clearer state statutory language so teachers and administrators understand what is permitted. "You can't advocate religion as a teacher," the sponsor said, arguing the bill draws a distinction between "black" actions (clearly prohibited, such as a coach leading a locker-room prayer) and "white" actions (clearly permissible, such as students privately choosing to pray).
Supporters said the bill offers teachers greater clarity for classroom instruction and permitted educational uses of religious material. Representative Jorgensen commended the committee for bringing diverse religious groups together and said the bill "removes a lot of that gray area and takes the monkey off [teachers'] back." Critics and questioners pressed the sponsor on several practical scenarios, including whether high-school choir performances of Handel's Messiah or student-led prayers at graduation would be allowed.
The sponsor responded that context and purpose matter: teaching about religious works as part of a music curriculum is different from staging a devotional service. He said a choir could perform Handel's Messiah when the purpose is musical or historical instruction and the facts around the performance show it is not a school-sponsored devotional. On graduation and other ceremonies, the sponsor reiterated that a school may not include a state-sponsored devotional but noted private groups could rent school facilities and hold voluntary services before school ceremonies.
The substitute bill removed language that would have treated teachers' discretionary time as off-duty after concerns raised by educators and the Utah Education Association (UEA). It preserves a right for students to request waivers or academic alternatives when activities infringe on conscience rights, and it allows schools three possible responses: waive participation, provide an equivalent academic alternative, or require participation when a claimed exemption is not a matter of conscience.
Members also debated whether the statute's language would create litigation to define terms such as "sponsor"; the sponsor acknowledged some facts will remain in a gray area and said courts could ultimately resolve contested cases. The House adopted an accompanying intent statement to be spread on the journal to help courts interpret legislative purpose.
The House voted to end debate, then recorded a final vote showing HB85 passed the body 71–0. The bill and its adopted intent language were referred to the Senate for further consideration.
The next procedural step is Senate consideration; the House also recorded the intent language in the journal to aid future judicial interpretation.
