Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Family Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves one‑year divorce case‑management pilot after fiscal debates
Summary
The Utah House passed House Bill 9, a one‑year judicial case‑management pilot for the Fifth District intended to shorten divorce proceedings and reduce adversarial litigation; members pressed the sponsor on a $130,000 fiscal note and the requirement that legal assistants be lawyers.
House Bill 9, a one‑year judicial case‑management pilot aimed at shortening divorce proceedings in the Fifth Judicial District, passed the Utah House on third reading after extended floor debate and an amendment removing a statewide "public policy" declaration.
Sponsor Representative Jay Brent Hayman urged passage, saying the pilot would allow telephone proceedings with judicial training and assign "law‑trained" legal assistants to support judges and manage discovery. Hayman said the measure is intended to "reduce the adversarial attitudes that divorces take on" and to lower costs for parties and the court system.
Opponents and questioners focused on two practical issues: the bill's fiscal note and the definition of a "law‑trained" assistant. Representative Stevens asked who set the fiscal note of $130,000 and whether the legal assistants would be used exclusively for the pilot. Hayman and staff said the administrative court provided the fiscal estimate and explained the three legal‑assistant positions would support four judges; Hayman acknowledged the number might be negotiable but said the House could seek a revised fiscal note in the Senate rules process.
Representative Alexander asked whether a paralegal could perform the role; Hayman said the bill specifies a lawyer‑trained person because the assistants must handle discovery and prepare written orders for judges. Members also debated whether declaring the pilot a matter of "public policy" in statute was premature; Representative Wright moved and the House approved an amendment deleting the broader declaration so the pilot's scope remains limited to the Fifth District.
Supporters cited prior use of the approach in California and judicial endorsements. Hayman told colleagues the pilot could affect about 12,000 divorces per year statewide and potentially reduce the adversarial impact on children and parents. After amendment and floor discussion, the House approved the bill 61‑7; the measure will now go to the Senate for consideration.
The next step is Senate referral and any further fiscal‑note adjustments or amendments there.
