Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Juvenile Programs topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House substitutes HB3 to create youth work programs, allow private contracting for facilities and allocate education funds for youth in custody

Utah House of Representatives · October 12, 1993
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House Bill 3 was substituted on the floor as an omnibus juvenile package: it establishes youth work programs, raises a minor age threshold for placements, authorizes contracting with private providers to accelerate facilities, and includes a $114,000 school-fund transfer for education of youth in custody; members circled the bill for further review on implementation details.

Lawmakers substituted House Bill 3 on Oct. 12 and described it as the central bill to implement parts of the governor’s anti-gang package.

Representative Short (sponsor) summarized the substitute bill as enabling work programs for youth offenders, changing the minimum age for certain placements (raising a previously low cutoff from 10 to 12), and permitting the Division of Youth Corrections to contract with private providers to speed construction or conversion of secure beds. The sponsor also said the bill includes a $114,000 appropriation from the Uniform School Fund for education of youth in custody; members questioned where that money would be reallocated from within the school fund and whether the statutory language belonged in the appropriations bill or the enabling statute. Because of legal and funding-availability questions, the House moved to 'circle' HB3 (a procedural pause) while staff and counsel clarified the 114,000 transfer and related statutory language.

Supporters argued the substitute will provide immediate options to increase capacity and create work programs; critics urged caution, asking that siting, community hearings, and program definitions be resolved before final implementation. The chair and sponsor said the urgency of the special session required expedient measures but also left some technical issues for later resolution.