Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Policy Retroactivity topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House records legislative intent for HB7 on retroactive tax refund interest
Summary
The House adopted a journal entry recording intent language for House Bill 7 stating that new interest provisions (subdivisions of 59-1-402) apply to retroactive tax cases, citing Brumley v. Utah State Tax Commission and allowing up to 180 days for legislative response.
The Utah House adopted a motion to include formal legislative intent language in the journal for House Bill 7, clarifying how the bill’s new interest provisions should apply to retroactive tax refund claims. Representative Valentine moved that the intent statement be spread upon the pages of the journal and members adopted the motion by voice.
The adopted language states that the new provisions on interest at subdivisions 59-1-402(6) and 59-1-402(5), effective January 1, 1994, apply to retroactive tax cases and specifically references claims owed pursuant to Brumley v. Utah State Tax Commission and Harper v. Virginia. The intent note says the legislature intends these provisions to apply to all retroactive tax cases and gives the legislature time (up to 180 days in the statute adopted with HB7) to respond in good faith to court holdings such as Davis v. Michigan.
Representative Valentine offered a brief explanation on the floor, saying the operative language applies specifically to claims for refunds owed pursuant to Brumley and gives the legislature time to respond to a retroactive case once the court has acted. Members approved the motion to include the intent language in the journal by voice vote.
Action details: motion to spread the intent statement on the journal (accompanying HB7) was moved and adopted by voice; the recorded intent cites statutory subdivisions and three court decisions as context for retroactivity considerations. The House took no additional formal action on implementation at that time.
