Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Term Limits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House passes substitute bill to impose 12‑year term limits, 53–19; amendments fail
Summary
The Utah House passed substitute House Bill 305 on term limits after a daylong debate and multiple failed amendments. The measure would impose 12 consecutive years as a limit for elected offices, with a trigger tied to other states for federal offices; it now goes to the Senate.
The Utah House of Representatives on the floor passed substitute House Bill 305, a broadly framed term‑limits measure, by a recorded vote of 53 in favor and 19 opposed and sent the bill to the Senate for further consideration.
Speaker Bishop, the bill’s sponsor, told members the proposal was meant to establish a practical implementation for limits rather than reopen the philosophical debate over whether term limits are desirable: “What I have before you is a simple bill that is easy to understand … It simply says that we will establish what I think is a moderate limitation of 12 years on all offices on the federal and state level,” he said during floor remarks.
The substitute bill would impose 12 consecutive years for covered offices. For federal offices the bill includes a trigger: federal term limits would go into effect for Utah only when at least half of the other states have adopted comparable measures. Opponents warned that the federal carve‑out and the prospect of immediate implementation could invite litigation or unfairly weaken Utah’s congressional seniority.
Representative Pignanelli moved an amendment to remove the federal exemption and apply term limits uniformly to federal offices; he said the public expects a “pure” term‑limits proposal and urged the House to present a straightforward question to voters. The amendment failed on a roll call (no vote 44, yes 25), as members who raised concerns about legal challenges and the state’s unilateral impact prevailed.
Representative Shepherd later proposed a separate amendment to make the limits apply immediately to current officeholders rather than starting the clock at a future date. Shepherd framed his proposal as a test of whether members genuinely supported term limits; the amendment did not pass.
Supporters framed the bill as a response to voter demand and as a carefully calibrated limit designed to allow learning time in office. Opponents cautioned about losing institutional memory and the value of experienced legislators. Representative Howard argued the House’s structure and rotation of leadership made broad differences with Congress and influenced his vote; Representative James, who declared a conflict of interest, opposed the bill, saying sudden wholesale turnover would damage institutional knowledge.
With the final tally recorded by the clerk, substitute House Bill 305 passed the House 53–19 and will be transmitted to the Senate for their consideration and any further floor or committee action.
