Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Indoor Smoking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House passes amended smoking restrictions; members debate airport lounge exclusion
Summary
The Utah House on March 1, 1994, passed House Bill 50 — expanding public indoor smoking restrictions — after the Senate’s amendments redefined and lowered fines and removed an airport lounge exclusion; a later motion to reconsider that change was introduced and heavily debated but did not succeed in undoing the House’s action.
The Utah House voted to approve House Bill 50, a measure tightening public indoor smoking rules, after concurring with Senate amendments that restructured penalties and excluded ventilated airport lounge boxes from the bill’s exemptions.
Representative Brittney Tanner, who explained the Senate amendments on the House floor, said the Senate ‘‘redefined [the fines] and actually lowered the fines’’ and described the change removing airport enclosed lounges as a ‘‘friendly amendment’’ because the Salt Lake Airport Authority had installed ventilated boxes that now would not be treated as exempt. Tanner urged colleagues to support the bill as a public‑health measure, saying, ‘‘By doing so, we will have accomplished one of the most important steps in public health for Utah in many, many years.’’
Opponents on the floor sought to recall the bill after the House acted, arguing the airport lounges’ treatment was inconsistent and that sending the measure back to the Senate risked losing the bill. Representative Bradshaw moved to reconsider the House’s action, saying the lounges were ‘‘open to the public’’ and that it seemed ‘‘a little backwards’’ to permit smoking in glass‑enclosed areas where children or non‑smokers may be present. Floor leaders warned that a successful recall would require a 50‑vote threshold and cautioned that reverting the bill risked defeating it in the Senate.
The House enrollment record shows HB50 passed after the concurrence vote; the floor debate over reconsideration extended into a lengthy exchange about the practical effect of the airport exclusion and the political risk of sending the measure back to the Senate. The record does not show the House returning a new concurrence to the Senate before adjournment.
The next procedural step after the House concurrence was transmission back to the Senate for signature by the president; any formal change would require further action in that chamber.
