Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Appropriations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House Refuses to Concur With Senate Amendment on Appropriations Bill, Sends Matter to Conference
Summary
The House refused to concur in a Senate amendment to House Bill 387 (Appropriations Act) that would alter how public-employee wage allocations are used, voting to ask the Senate to recede and appointing a conference committee to reconcile differences.
Get email alerts on the Appropriations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House of Representatives voted to refuse concurrence with a Senate amendment to House Bill 387, the Appropriations Act, after the House said the amendment would change how public-employee wage allocations may be used.
Secretary of the Senate Eugene Bridges had transmitted the Senate’s passage of HB 387 under suspension of the rules. Representative Valentine moved that the House refuse to concur in a single substantive Senate amendment that the House said would permit the entire wage allocation to be used for merit increases; the House had directed the allocation be used for a different purpose. After brief discussion, members voted in favor of refusing to concur and asked the Senate to recede.
The refusal to concur was recorded by voice vote. The House then authorized the Speaker to appoint a conference committee to meet with the Senate if the upper chamber would not recede from its amendment. Later in the day the Speaker appointed representatives to serve on that conference committee to negotiate the final language.
Why it matters: Concurrence fights over appropriations determine how state payroll and wage-policy decisions are implemented. The appointment of a conference committee means legislative leaders from both chambers will meet to try to craft language acceptable to both bodies; absent agreement, the bill’s final funding and policy directions could be delayed.
Next steps: The conference committee members will meet with their Senate counterparts to seek compromise. The House’s formal refusal to concur requires a return to the Senate for either recission or negotiation; no final funding or implementation actions were taken in the House vote.
