Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves substitute bill changing distribution of transportation fund revenues
Summary
The House approved Substitute House Bill 130 to alter the apportionment formula for revenue generated by state highway user taxes and fees (affecting state, county and local shares), passing the measure 64–8 after sponsor Representative Price outlined the Wilbur Smith study history and fiscal implications.
The Utah House on Feb. 24 passed Substitute House Bill 130, which changes how revenues from state highway user tax/fee increases are apportioned between state and local governments in certain circumstances.
Representative Dan Price, presenting the substitute, described the bill as the product of extended study (citing the Wilbur Smith work) and said the substitute modifies distribution formulas for revenue generated by rate increases. Price told colleagues the substitute shifts long‑run shares to better fund road maintenance and to accommodate jurisdictional transfers; he described a scenario in which $10 million would be used to bring transferred roads up to standard.
Members asked whether the substitute would include other tax shifts; Price clarified the language applies only to rate increases on highway user taxes and fees that become effective on or after Jan. 1, 1994. Critics raised concerns about unknown federal mandates and the timing of any revenue increases. Price and supporters said the substitute attempts compromise among state, county and city needs.
The House approved the substitute by recorded vote, 64 yes to 8 no. The bill will be transmitted to the Utah Senate for consideration.
Next steps: HB 130 moves to the Senate. Sponsors and local officials will likely press for details about the bill's impact on specific county and city road funds if the Senate considers amendments.
